Search for: "Davis v. American Federation of Government Employees"
Results 1 - 20
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
Brooks v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:55 am
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Requirements Concerning the Provisions of Interpreters by Hospitals and Doctors Report No. 97-826Subjects: Disabled PersonsCRS Reports, 111th Congress (9/9/2010; Posted: 9/27/2010)---------------------------------Federal Employees' Retirement System: Benefits and Financing Report No. 98-810Subjects: Civil Service; Government Employees; PensionsCRS Reports, 111th Congress (9/15/2010; Posted:… [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
(Although as a general matter, voting within state and local government must follow the one-person, one-vote rule of Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
And if a state can’t attack employees of the federal government, neither should it be free to attack contractors, which are in effect substitutes for federal employees themselves.That leaves us with the only possible basis for state authority in this realm being spending discretion. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:46 pm
” In this regard, the Court noted that while Vance claimed that Davis had sufficient authority to direct her work to be considered her supervisor, the federal government, appearing as amicus curiae, was of the view that Davis did not sufficiently direct plaintiff’s work and thus was not plaintiff’s supervisor — even though the government advocated the “direct the work” definition. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:01 pm
Ass’n of American Railroads. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
” Title VII claims are governed by the general grant of federal-question jurisdiction (authority of federal courts to hear cases that involve federal law) as well as a jurisdictional provision contained in the statute itself. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the justices will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
Political activity is not an official duty required of a federal government employee. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
It was a political hit job carried out by the extreme conservative majority on the Supreme Court.When McConnell attacks some states for having committed to providing employees with a dignified retirement, therefore, he is not attacking the federalist idea that states are superior to the federal government. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 4:52 pm
For example, a federal court has just this past February upheld a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board approving the dismissal of a Navy mathematical statistician, in Davis v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Contrary to common wisdom, federal law does not impose a legal duty on large employers to offer their employees access to a health insurance plan, or to subsidize such a plan. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
The EO creates various new obligations for contractors doing business with the Federal Government. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Demers v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
For a (rare) example in which one of these statutes comes up, see Davis v. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Elonis v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
And thus the American conundrum. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, and whether the First Amendment and the Supreme Court’s decision in NAACP v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
